<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Desert Conservative</title>
	<link>http://www.desertconservative.com</link>
	<description>Conservative Views</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 14:37:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Obama&#8230;Denying truth, denying his own words and denying reality! by Lee S. Gliddon, Jr.</title>
		<link>http://www.desertconservative.com/2008/05/16/obamadenying-truth-denying-his-own-words-and-denying-reality/#comment-2162</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee S. Gliddon, Jr.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 23:58:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.desertconservative.com/2008/05/16/obamadenying-truth-denying-his-own-words-and-denying-reality/#comment-2162</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your honesty! Obama is not a true representative of the Democrats but is one of the Liberals or Liberal Progressives that disguise as Democrats to claim to be a majority in the House and Senate!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your honesty! Obama is not a true representative of the Democrats but is one of the Liberals or Liberal Progressives that disguise as Democrats to claim to be a majority in the House and Senate!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Obama&#8230;Denying truth, denying his own words and denying reality! by DEM to IND</title>
		<link>http://www.desertconservative.com/2008/05/16/obamadenying-truth-denying-his-own-words-and-denying-reality/#comment-2161</link>
		<dc:creator>DEM to IND</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 23:44:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.desertconservative.com/2008/05/16/obamadenying-truth-denying-his-own-words-and-denying-reality/#comment-2161</guid>
		<description>I am a Democrat and agree.  We all heard Obama in the debate with Hillary Clinton. No Obama.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a Democrat and agree.  We all heard Obama in the debate with Hillary Clinton. No Obama.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Abhorrent&#8230; by Lee S. Gliddon, Jr.</title>
		<link>http://www.desertconservative.com/2008/05/15/abhorrent/#comment-2147</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee S. Gliddon, Jr.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 01:27:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.desertconservative.com/2008/05/15/abhorrent/#comment-2147</guid>
		<description>Yourv explanation of what the Christian Bible is all about is blatantly wrong. As a Pastor and a Christian I know that of the many Verses in the Bible that speak on homosexuality all name it as not only a sin but a deadly sin! To infer that a 'blur' is almost laughable.

I see homosexuality as a sin if it is being actively practiced. To say otherwise is both inane and unworthy of any individual. But, if the need for sex is greater than the need of salvation, then consequences must be expected. Also, it is not the fear of all that homosexuals are attempting to lure everyone to their lifestyle. It is the approach that ias unwanted and the fear of repercussions for voicing their thoughts of having those approaches stopped.

The 'gay community' chooses to flaunt their lifestyle before the world and literally dares anyone to confront that issue. That is just as sinful as anything imaginable. When did you last see a parade that clebrates hoterosexuality? When is the last time you witnessed a sex act done in public and applauded as something to be admired? 

"Love thy neighbor as thy love thyself." That is often difficult as the one you seek to accept has such excessive thoughts of sexual natures that those very thoughts prevent that person from thinking of anything else!

To grant 'special rights' to any, simply because they have sexual views that are not of the generral public is to invite the downfall of society! If man wants to be seen as equal, that that man knows no 'special rights' are due to be granted!

I will make you a contract that is uncancellable. One condition is, 'do not tell me what goes on in your bedroom and I will not tell you about what goes on in mine! I am not one that wants to know what is preferred if no laws are being violated!  

Wether you like it or not there is not one marriage of man to man or woman to woman in the Bible. Not one! There has been no recognitionj of same sex marriages for some 7,000+ yeras and it should not statrt now! If a 'Contract of Mutual Consent' is needed, fine. But, to say that 'If I cannot marry' is an denial of someones Rights, I wonder what the true motivation is for that statement! If I am to give liove and RESPECT to a person, am I not entitled to get RECIPROCATION? 

I do not throw stones in a glass house but, neither do I parade around in a sexual nature and wexpext to be taken seriously!

Nuff Said!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yourv explanation of what the Christian Bible is all about is blatantly wrong. As a Pastor and a Christian I know that of the many Verses in the Bible that speak on homosexuality all name it as not only a sin but a deadly sin! To infer that a &#8216;blur&#8217; is almost laughable.</p>
<p>I see homosexuality as a sin if it is being actively practiced. To say otherwise is both inane and unworthy of any individual. But, if the need for sex is greater than the need of salvation, then consequences must be expected. Also, it is not the fear of all that homosexuals are attempting to lure everyone to their lifestyle. It is the approach that ias unwanted and the fear of repercussions for voicing their thoughts of having those approaches stopped.</p>
<p>The &#8216;gay community&#8217; chooses to flaunt their lifestyle before the world and literally dares anyone to confront that issue. That is just as sinful as anything imaginable. When did you last see a parade that clebrates hoterosexuality? When is the last time you witnessed a sex act done in public and applauded as something to be admired? </p>
<p>&#8220;Love thy neighbor as thy love thyself.&#8221; That is often difficult as the one you seek to accept has such excessive thoughts of sexual natures that those very thoughts prevent that person from thinking of anything else!</p>
<p>To grant &#8217;special rights&#8217; to any, simply because they have sexual views that are not of the generral public is to invite the downfall of society! If man wants to be seen as equal, that that man knows no &#8217;special rights&#8217; are due to be granted!</p>
<p>I will make you a contract that is uncancellable. One condition is, &#8216;do not tell me what goes on in your bedroom and I will not tell you about what goes on in mine! I am not one that wants to know what is preferred if no laws are being violated!  </p>
<p>Wether you like it or not there is not one marriage of man to man or woman to woman in the Bible. Not one! There has been no recognitionj of same sex marriages for some 7,000+ yeras and it should not statrt now! If a &#8216;Contract of Mutual Consent&#8217; is needed, fine. But, to say that &#8216;If I cannot marry&#8217; is an denial of someones Rights, I wonder what the true motivation is for that statement! If I am to give liove and RESPECT to a person, am I not entitled to get RECIPROCATION? </p>
<p>I do not throw stones in a glass house but, neither do I parade around in a sexual nature and wexpext to be taken seriously!</p>
<p>Nuff Said!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Abhorrent&#8230; by RoseRN</title>
		<link>http://www.desertconservative.com/2008/05/15/abhorrent/#comment-2136</link>
		<dc:creator>RoseRN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 00:29:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.desertconservative.com/2008/05/15/abhorrent/#comment-2136</guid>
		<description>The Constitution gives everyone equal rights. It does not, nor should it, say except for homosexuals.  More and more evidence, is proving homosexuality is genetic. It absolutely is NOT a choice. It is NOT against "the very laws of man"!! That is an uneducated opinion, not fact. It's past time for people to get over their holier-than-thou attitudes! Some preachers have decided to interpret a passage in their bible, as saying homosexuality is a sin. That is THEIR interpretation, not all agree with what that passage actuality states. Their bible is interpreted from the original one, which was written in Hebrew. It was old and faded. In Hebrew, a dot or a dash can completely change the meaning of the word. There are many notations, showing other possible interpretations of that, as well as many other, passages. If man is made in His image, who are we to judge? Gays in NO way effect marriage or heterosexual lifestyles. Someone gay, would never be interested in a heterosexual. Contrary to what many ignorant, uninformed people think, gays do NOT try to convert anyone to being gay, and they are NOT child molesters! They are people, just like you or me, except they are wired differently. They lead productive lives, make excellent parents and live their lives just as we do. They have EVERY right to be in a happy, monogamous relationship, as every other citizen! Discrimination for ANY reason, is wrong and should be illegal. We have NO right to foist OUR opinions on them. It is none of anyone's business, what goes on in bedrooms. There are many heterosexual sexual activities, that would be condemned by some...are we going to ostracize them? ask everyone what goes on in their bedrooms? set up what we judge to be acceptable? Man alone, has said marriage should be between a man and a woman. Why? Not because of procreation, as not all couples want children. Should we prevent them from marrying? Stop being so judgmental!! Think about it! Being gay is probably genetic, just as having blue eyes is. In my opinion, it's pathetic for any person to dictate (vote) how anyone should live, before they look closely at their own glass house.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Constitution gives everyone equal rights. It does not, nor should it, say except for homosexuals.  More and more evidence, is proving homosexuality is genetic. It absolutely is NOT a choice. It is NOT against &#8220;the very laws of man&#8221;!! That is an uneducated opinion, not fact. It&#8217;s past time for people to get over their holier-than-thou attitudes! Some preachers have decided to interpret a passage in their bible, as saying homosexuality is a sin. That is THEIR interpretation, not all agree with what that passage actuality states. Their bible is interpreted from the original one, which was written in Hebrew. It was old and faded. In Hebrew, a dot or a dash can completely change the meaning of the word. There are many notations, showing other possible interpretations of that, as well as many other, passages. If man is made in His image, who are we to judge? Gays in NO way effect marriage or heterosexual lifestyles. Someone gay, would never be interested in a heterosexual. Contrary to what many ignorant, uninformed people think, gays do NOT try to convert anyone to being gay, and they are NOT child molesters! They are people, just like you or me, except they are wired differently. They lead productive lives, make excellent parents and live their lives just as we do. They have EVERY right to be in a happy, monogamous relationship, as every other citizen! Discrimination for ANY reason, is wrong and should be illegal. We have NO right to foist OUR opinions on them. It is none of anyone&#8217;s business, what goes on in bedrooms. There are many heterosexual sexual activities, that would be condemned by some&#8230;are we going to ostracize them? ask everyone what goes on in their bedrooms? set up what we judge to be acceptable? Man alone, has said marriage should be between a man and a woman. Why? Not because of procreation, as not all couples want children. Should we prevent them from marrying? Stop being so judgmental!! Think about it! Being gay is probably genetic, just as having blue eyes is. In my opinion, it&#8217;s pathetic for any person to dictate (vote) how anyone should live, before they look closely at their own glass house.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Iran is Declaring War with Israel! by Lee S. Gliddon, Jr.</title>
		<link>http://www.desertconservative.com/2008/05/14/iran-is-declaring-war-with-israel/#comment-2108</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee S. Gliddon, Jr.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 21:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.desertconservative.com/2008/05/14/iran-is-declaring-war-with-israel/#comment-2108</guid>
		<description>While we are at it, why not accept Israel as our 51st State? That way we would be within our Rights to stand up to any all all agressors that would seek to invade the United States of America.

Before you laugh at this consider the fact that we granted Statehood to Hawaii. Just as Israel, Hawaii was a Kingdom. 

Hmmmm Food for thought?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While we are at it, why not accept Israel as our 51st State? That way we would be within our Rights to stand up to any all all agressors that would seek to invade the United States of America.</p>
<p>Before you laugh at this consider the fact that we granted Statehood to Hawaii. Just as Israel, Hawaii was a Kingdom. </p>
<p>Hmmmm Food for thought?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Iran is Declaring War with Israel! by Saint Michael Traveler</title>
		<link>http://www.desertconservative.com/2008/05/14/iran-is-declaring-war-with-israel/#comment-2101</link>
		<dc:creator>Saint Michael Traveler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 21:03:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.desertconservative.com/2008/05/14/iran-is-declaring-war-with-israel/#comment-2101</guid>
		<description>Israel a Member of the Common Wealth of the United States

No one can reject the fact that creation of Israel on the land of Arabic nations has created tremendous problems for the United States. We may have to look outside of the box to diffuse the problems.  One solution would be for Israel joining us as a member of the Unites States’ Common Wealth.  

What are costs and benefits for US?  

We are already supporting Israel economically, politically and by sharing intelligence and military hardware.  In addition, some Israeli Americans with both Israeli and American citizenships serve in the Israeli Armed Forces. Israel never would have to be fearful of any other nation; our great American Armed Forces will protect the common wealth as they would the homeland. 

Would it be politically more advantages for the United States to manage the Jewish state as a member of our Common Wealth? 

Would it be economically more advantages for Israeli people to be a member of our nation?

The Israeli Common Wealth will be free to exercise the religious freedom that our great nation would offer without being isolated among the hostile Arabs.  

What do you think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Israel a Member of the Common Wealth of the United States</p>
<p>No one can reject the fact that creation of Israel on the land of Arabic nations has created tremendous problems for the United States. We may have to look outside of the box to diffuse the problems.  One solution would be for Israel joining us as a member of the Unites States’ Common Wealth.  </p>
<p>What are costs and benefits for US?  </p>
<p>We are already supporting Israel economically, politically and by sharing intelligence and military hardware.  In addition, some Israeli Americans with both Israeli and American citizenships serve in the Israeli Armed Forces. Israel never would have to be fearful of any other nation; our great American Armed Forces will protect the common wealth as they would the homeland. </p>
<p>Would it be politically more advantages for the United States to manage the Jewish state as a member of our Common Wealth? </p>
<p>Would it be economically more advantages for Israeli people to be a member of our nation?</p>
<p>The Israeli Common Wealth will be free to exercise the religious freedom that our great nation would offer without being isolated among the hostile Arabs.  </p>
<p>What do you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Democrats seek to derail STIMULOUS PACKAGE! by Lee S. Gliddon, Jr.</title>
		<link>http://www.desertconservative.com/2008/01/30/democrats-seek-to-derail-stimulous-package/#comment-2077</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee S. Gliddon, Jr.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 17:58:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.desertconservative.com/2008/01/30/democrats-seek-to-derail-stimulous-package/#comment-2077</guid>
		<description>I know nothing about the schedule but think you can get info online. Maybe 'Tax Stimulous' will find you a link.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know nothing about the schedule but think you can get info online. Maybe &#8216;Tax Stimulous&#8217; will find you a link.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Democrats seek to derail STIMULOUS PACKAGE! by william j. schroeder</title>
		<link>http://www.desertconservative.com/2008/01/30/democrats-seek-to-derail-stimulous-package/#comment-2047</link>
		<dc:creator>william j. schroeder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 00:08:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.desertconservative.com/2008/01/30/democrats-seek-to-derail-stimulous-package/#comment-2047</guid>
		<description>according to all the reports. i was to get my stimulous check automaticly deposited on the 9th. but, didn't are there certian restricions on them please ex plain</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>according to all the reports. i was to get my stimulous check automaticly deposited on the 9th. but, didn&#8217;t are there certian restricions on them please ex plain</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Devastation in China by Lee S. Gliddon, Jr.</title>
		<link>http://www.desertconservative.com/2008/05/12/devastation-in-china/#comment-2046</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee S. Gliddon, Jr.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 23:51:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.desertconservative.com/2008/05/12/devastation-in-china/#comment-2046</guid>
		<description>The "nagas of Tibet,' are  they also "reaaly huge?'"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;nagas of Tibet,&#8217; are  they also &#8220;reaaly huge?&#8217;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Devastation in China by denice everham</title>
		<link>http://www.desertconservative.com/2008/05/12/devastation-in-china/#comment-2040</link>
		<dc:creator>denice everham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 22:44:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.desertconservative.com/2008/05/12/devastation-in-china/#comment-2040</guid>
		<description>I'm sorry for China and it people.  However it is the nagas of Tibet that are angry.  When china harms Tibet the Nagas get angry and send floods and earth quakes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sorry for China and it people.  However it is the nagas of Tibet that are angry.  When china harms Tibet the Nagas get angry and send floods and earth quakes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
