Clinton Supporters claim Obama is not a Natural Born Citizen and was registered as a Muslim several times during his lifetime.
By Albert N. Milliron, Editor, Politisite.com
“Is Judge Carter being pressured by Obama? ” “Apparently now Hillary Clinton has stated that Lolo Soetoro was not … Navigation: use the links below to view more comments. … It doesn’t say anyone is NOT a “natural born citizen”. …LINK PULLED! WHAT IS OBAMA HIDING?
Editorial: Oct. 6, 2009 — The Hillary Moment: Use it or Lose it
October 6, 2009 by John Charlton
WHY HILARY CLINTON IS AT THE PEAK OF HER POWER and WHAT SHE CAN DO WITH IT
by John Charlton
I did not vote for Hillary Clinton. But this week I am a Hilary Clinton fan, in a sense. Let me explain.
Hillary Clinton, the Secretary of State of the United States under Barack Hussein Obama, is, in my opinion, the most powerful person on the planet right now; that is, this week.
She holds this position because the unique circumstances of history which have brought the United States into its present Constitutional Crisis; and of events which have unwittingly put her in the position of restoring the Republic and the Democratic Party, by her action, or destroying the same by her inaction.
Why?
Because this week Plaintiffs in two cases are waiting to hear judgment whether they have standing to sue Obama for not being eligible to hold the office of presidency.
And its obvious as heck that the judges are scared to death, in my opinion, of the consequences of granting standing, on the one hand, because of the political turmoil that they believe would result; and, on the other, are concerned about destroying public confidence in the Article III judiciary.
The cases of which I speak are Barnett vs. Obama and Kerchner vs. Obama; and they are in the hands of Judges David O. Carter, of the California Southern Division and Jerome B. Simandle the New Jersey Middle Division federal courts.
This, combined with the massive outpouring of public wrath at the course Congress and the Obama Administration have taken in the last 9 months, the 1.7+ million Tea Partiers who marched assembled in Washington, D.c., last month, and the sinking support in the polls for Obama, put Hilary in an enviable position; unique in her career, unique in the history of the nation.
If Hilary Clinton just simply said simple one sentence, this week, it would cause the Obama administration to implode; resurrect the Democratic party as a viable entity in the 2010 elections, and be met with a swift ground swell of support from the entire people of the United States who still believe in the rule of law.
What is this sentence?
“After careful legal and historical study, I don’t believe Obama is a natural born citizen; and therefore I request Congress to hold hearings to determine whether he lawfully occupies the office of President of the United States, in accord with the objective requirements of Article II, Section i, paragraph 5, of the U.S. Constitution!”
Such a statement would show the following about Hilary Clinton’s character:
1) It would definitely demonstrate that she is a person of integrity, who puts the U.S. Constitution before all else.
2) It would definitely prove that, as a woman, she is not a follower but a leader.
Such a statement would have the following beneficial results from either her point of view, or objectively speaking.
1) It would show Democrats and Republicans that there is life in the political corridors of Washington, D.C., and that her sense of integrity will not be silenced on any issue.
2) It would revitalize the Democratic Party; not only by energizing the Hilary Democrats, but by giving her fellow Democrats who are Senators and Representatives a way of saving their 2010 relection campaigns, by definitively distancing themselves from the constant parade of lies from Obama and his ongoing campaign.
3) It pull the planks out from under the Republican Party, who has not shown even as much integrity or honesty on the issue; and forestall their claim to this issue in the 2010 elections.
4) It would create a political climate in which Carter and Simandle could uphold the constitution.
5) It would completely demolish the house of cards upon which Obama has built his candidacy and regime.
6) It would be simply be the truth.
7) It would be the consummate political maneuver of the century.
It would put her in line to ascend to the presidency, when Obama and Biden are shown to be fraud and co-conspirator in fraud, as they are.
9) It would be her right, for having been robbed of the Democratic Nomination by fraud in the primaries (TX, MI, FL).
10) It would be “impeachable testimony,”* because it is manifestly evident from the books of law and history, and from Obama’s biographies, that his father being a british subject, at the time of his birth, causes him to be ipso fact, NOT a natural born citizen; and therefore ineligible to be president.
Finally, to those who might criticize Hillary Clinton for accepting the position of Secretary of State under Obama; it could easily been shown that for many Americans, even the best legal minds, it has taken more than a year to clarify this issue properly, and that she has now had sufficient time to inform herself and assure herself of the justice of acting now.
Lady Secretary, for the love your bear our great Nation; I ask you to use this power, which Providence has placed in your hands; and speak out!
Finally, Hilary Clinton is at the peak of her power this week, because once this moment passes, she either will be just another stooge on the ship of tyranny, or pirate on the sinking ship of fraud; she will have missed her moment for self-liberation, self-vindication, and rebirth.
If Carter should deny standing, Simandle will certain follow suit; then Hilary would be in a new position, where she could not claim a neutral legal question; and would have reason to believe that no one would heed her. She would be silenced, and powerless to do anything other than resign, if she wanted to distance herself from Obama.
This week all eyes can look to Washington, and watch Hilary Clinton; is she the creature of a male dominated, demogagic political machine, which just plays up to minority interests, and uses women, especially her, to garner votes for an old boy system; or is she a genuine leader of woman and of men; destined to be one of the leading female figures of American History and of patriotic tradition in centuries to come.
In a way Hilary might be positioned to be a second mother to the Nation; because its very existence as a free nation lies in a sense in her hands; and she has power of life or power of death over it.
Charges similar to these have been served more than 400 times in various ‘jurisdictions’ across the country, according to Neil Turner an advocate for this lawsuit. He continues to report that “there are actually 3,141 jurisdictions in which charges can be served.”
“Lt. Commander Fitzpatrick is now serving these very same charges, which include an original two-page charge of Treason, to a sitting Grand Jury in Monroe County, TN,” Turner explained.
As word of the “birth certificate drama” surfaced on the airwaves last week due to a question posed to Sarah Palin by talk show host Rusty Humphries and reported on by World Net Daily, the drama resurfaced. Palin was asked point blank if Obama’s birth certificate was okay for public fodder. “Yes,” was her answer. According to Palin, American’s have the right to request President Obama’s birth certificate; however, in a statement on her Facebook page Palin defers her opinion on this case. “But at no point – not during the campaign, and not during recent interviews – have I asked the president to produce his birth certificate or suggested that he was not born in the United States.”
Those in the know realize that this was a brilliant exposure of the birth certificate issue without Palin having to get behind it. The media would love to bash her for anything, but not this because it would force them to talk about the dubious birth certificate, which they are forbidden from doing – for fear of losing their jobs and their stations losing their FCC licenses.
During the election cycle Palin’s running mate McCain was asked for his birth certificate because he was born in the Panama Canal. And the Senate actually passed a non-binding resolution (S-511) to resolve that McCain was a ‘natural-born’ citizen. They were unable to do this for Obama however.
The people who want this issue to go away have displayed what they say is a Hawaiian birth certificate. However, that piece of paper is not proof of Hawaiian birth. It is a Hawaiian Certification of live Birth, which John Sampson, a 27-year veteran of ICE contends is different from a Hawaiian Birth Certificate.
“When this issue first was raised, in June of 2008, I was intrigued, being ICE’s non- lawyer legal geek for enforcement in Denver. I had an agent who was born in Hawaii bring in his actual Hawaiian birth certificate and I compared it to the document posted on the Daily KOS and Stop the Smears sites,” says Sampson. “It is markedly different from a Certification of live birth. The birth certificate has the hospital or other birthing facility where the birth happened, the doctor’s name, midwife’s name, or other health professional who attended the birth and other information that a certification of live birth lacks. The reason why the certification of live birth does not have this information is because it is issued based upon the unverified report of an adult, usually the parent, or some other person.”
Sampson explains that there is no requirement that evidence be supplied that the birth actually occurred in Hawaii. It is issued simply on the attestation of the reporting party. “Furthermore, Hawaiian law allows for the reporting of a birth of a child born outside the Hawaiian Islands as long as one parent claims to have resided in Hawaii as their principal place of residence for the year prior to the child’s birth. It’s a law that is uniquely Hawaiian.” (This law was in effect from 1911 to 1972)
“I’ve been following this, as I said, since June of 2008. Given what I know and what I’ve seen, I believe there is sufficient evidence to support the belief that Barrack Obama is not a natural born US citizen, applying the law as it existed in 1961,” says Sampson. (And the continuing Article II, Section 1 requirements of the Constitution – since 1779)
He explains that the law changed in 1986 in which the residency requirement was relaxed in the U.S. However, there was no retroactivity of that change in the law in 1986 and as such, assuming he (the president) was not born in Hawaii as everyone has been led to believe, then he’s not a natural born United States citizen. If he is not born here he is not constitutionally qualified or eligible to hold the office of President of the United States.
“One who acquires their citizenship at a later time, regardless of how soon after their birth, either by derivation or by naturalization, although a U.S. citizen, is not a U.S. ‘Natural-Born’ citizen by birth. The best example I can offer is former Secretary of State Madeline Allbright, who was born in Eastern Europe and who became a naturalized U.S. citizen. She is a citizen of the United States. However, she is not a “natural born U.S. citizen” and as such is constitutionally barred from holding the office of President of the United States,” according to Sampson.
“This is very serious stuff and it concerns me deeply because I took an oath to support and defend the Constitution of the United States of America, against all enemies, foreign and domestic, to bear true faith and allegiance to the same, and to faithfully discharge the duties of the office I was entering,” Sampson said. “I took that oath without purpose of evasion or avoidance. I took it seriously then, and I take it seriously now.”
This is one theory into the Obama drama.
However, Turner believes the birth certificate issue is a red herring because “he was not born of two parents who were both U.S. citizens, regardless of whether he was born in Hawaii or Kenya or Equatorial Guinea (another country that has recently turned up in records research by a former U.S. Immigration official working with Orly Taitz). This is the biggest fraud in the 230 years of this country and will have severe political implications,” Turner explained. “We have a Constitutional crisis on our hands.”
Turner believes all 535 Congress members are responsible for allowing Obama to take office and to this day there is not one member of Congress that has taken a stand against the sitting President on this issue.
Another agency responsible for the travesty says Turner is the Congressional Research Service (CRS) who is responsible for telling Congress members how to answer different questions various members of Congress may get from constituents. “They told Congress members the birth certificate issue has been resolved, when it hasn’t,” Turner claims.
“Another interesting aspect to the ‘Treason charge,’” according to Turner, “is the fact that Obama failed to register for the draft as required for all male U.S. citizens between the ages of 18 and 26 at that time (1981 for Obama), with the consequence of not being able to ever work for the U.S. Postal Service (big deal) and not being able to work in the Executive Branch of Government (really big deal). In order to ‘avoid’ this consequence, Obama produced a falsified and forged Selective Service Registration for the Draft (sometime in 2008). Details can be found at DebbieSchlussel.com”, Turner said.
In other news regarding Obama’s eligibility it has just been uncovered recently that his Social Security number may have been issued in Connecticut between 1976 and 1977. During this time, Obama was residing in Hawaii and attending prep school. He did not move to the mainland (LA to go to Occidental College) until late 1979. And as far anyone knows Obama never resided in Connecticut. This begs the question how did the president get a Connecticut Social Security card when he never resided in the Constitution State?
Many Americans do not believe in the birth certificate hype, however as the President’s approval ratings plummet many more are taking Obama to task over a simple piece of paper that could solve everything.
For more stories;
http://www.examiner.com/x-10317-San-Diego-County-Political-Buzz-Examiner
December 14th, 2009 at 2:19 pm
Dream on.
HIllary will never say any such thing because (1) there is legal proof that Obama was born in Hawaii. (2) Natural Born means “born in the country.”
December 14th, 2009 at 2:43 pm
SMR. WHERE IS IT? Not the phony document Obama produced…the real thing! Do not be so gullible!
December 14th, 2009 at 2:54 pm
Re: “Not the phony document Obama produced…the real thing!”
It is you who are gullible. The document Obama has produced is the official birth certificate, and the facts on it were twice confirmed by two officials in the administration of the Republican governor of Hawaii, and their statement said bluntly that the facts in the file MEAN that Obama aws born in Hawaii. (http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2008/11/obama_hawaaianborn_citizen_for.html).
This is what the Wall Street Journal said:
““Obama has already provided a legal birth certificate demonstrating that he was born in Hawaii. No one has produced any serious evidence to the contrary. Absent such evidence, it is unreasonable to deny that Obama has met the burden of proof. We know that he was born in Honolulu as surely as we know that Bill Clinton was born in Hope, Ark., or George W. Bush in New Haven, Conn.”