Submitted by: John Butler
December 10, 2009
RAND Corporation Blueprint for Militarized “Stability Police Force”
The RAND Corporation, one of the most fecund research arms of the Military-Industrial-Homeland Security Complex, has released a study entitled A Stability Police Force for the United States: Justification and Creating U.S. Capabilities.
The SPFOR (to use the inevitable acronym) would be a “hybrid” military/law enforcement unit created within the U.S. Marshals Service (USMS) for use “in a range of tasks such as crowd and riot control, special weapons and tactics (SWAT), and investigations of organized criminal groups” — both abroad, in UN-directed multilateral military operations, and at home, as dictated by the needs of the Regime.
Initially as small as 2–6,000 personnel, the SPFOR’s size “could be increased by augmenting it with additional federal, state, or local police from the United States” as necessary.
The RAND study, which was conducted for the U.S. Army’s Peacekeeping and Stability Operations Institute, recommended using the Marshals Service rather than the US Army’s Military Police as host for the SPFOR in order to avoid conflicts with the Posse Comitatus Act, which forbids (albeit in principle more than in practice) the domestic use of the military as a law enforcement body.
“The USMS hybrid option … provides an important nondeployed mission for the force: augmenting state and local agencies, many of which currently suffer from severe personnel shortages,” states the report without explaining how the SPFOR could at once “augment” those under-manned agencies while at the same time being “augmented” by them if necessary.
That little lapse in logic is one of several indications that the report’s authors weren’t so much addressing a “problem” as making a case for a preordained “solution” — in this case, creating the vanguard of a militarized internal security force.
Building the SPFOR within the Marshals Service “would place it where its members can develop the needed skills under the hybrid staffing option,” summarizes the document. “Furthermore, the USMS has the broadest law enforcement mandate of any U.S. law enforcement agency…. [This model] provides significant domestic policing and homeland security benefits by providing thousands of additional police officers across the United States.” (Emphasis added.)
Back in 1961, the U.S. Government produced a document entitled “Freedom From War” that envisioned the creation of a globe-spanning United Nations “Peace Force” that would work in collaboration with a militarized “internal security” force in each country. Since that time, critics of the UN have anticipated the day when foreign “peacekeepers” would be assigned to police American streets and, if necessary, confiscate privately owned firearms.
While the monstrosity headquartered on the East River is a proper target of our scorn and hostility, the new RAND study underscores the fact that if “peacekeepers” end up patrolling American streets, they probably won’t be foreigners in blue berets, but homegrown jackboots commanded by Washington.
(My thanks to Jack Slater for tipping me about the RAND report.)



December 13th, 2009 at 12:05 am
This idea by the Rand Corporation seems to tie in with an idea Obama expressed prior to the election, when he called for the creation of a national police force as large as, and as well-funded, as the US Military. I doubt they’d stop with a few thousand SPF forces. More likely it would be several tens of thousands, and would be tied in with the NSA and Homeland Security for internal security purposes – which would undoubtedly become its main function. Rand repeatedly mentions bringing it into the US Marshal’s Service as an end-run around the Posse Comitatus “problem.” We’re seeing them thinking through plans for the end of the American Experiment and the institution of 1984 or a Brave New World, thanks to those brain-dead voters in 2008. New Zealand is starting to look pretty good.
December 13th, 2009 at 8:57 am
Let them do whatever they want, no disrespect to our current military but we can’t control or suppress the insurgents in Iraq or Afghanistan do you really think that they could handle US Patriot? The Liberals when they get what they think they wanted will hide under their beds and pray to some unknown god or plant for someone to help them. I am in the Oath Keepers, former Fed. LE. and most of my friends are OK’s too. We say Bring it on, and it’s about time. So note to the brown shirted want to be Jack booted thug. Please come out west for an a$$ kicking that will be biblical. Oh and try Texas too, I heard they like to fight also.
D. Marble