|
Submitted by: John Butler
Thank you WorldNetDaily
http://wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=102746 ***CALL TO ACTION***
LET’S GET ENGAGED AMERICA!!!! FAX, E-MAIL, CALL, WRITE LETTERS TO ALL OF THESE BUT MAKE CHIEF MAGISTRATE JUDGE OF THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT, ROYCE LAMBERTH YOUR FIRST CONTACT. SOME NEED TO SEND A FREEDOM OF INFORMATION REQUEST TO THESE PEOPLE AS THAT WILL FORCE CONFIRMATION OF RECEIPT AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF THE CRIMINAL COMPLAINT. Presentments filed in D.C.!!! July 2nd We may have missed a few but we’ll work with this for now. American Grand Jury Spokespeople: Mack Ellis Dr. Penny Kelso Carl Swensson and Chalice Jackson, Citizen Journalist from http://www.patriotsheartnetwork.com/ On Monday, June 29, 2009, the team met with and handed SuperAmericanGrandJury Presentments to: 1. Secret Service for the White House – SERVED Senator John McCain 10:10 a.m. True Americans, that’s 16 of our Senators and Representatives SERVED PRESENTMENTS!!! Normal, ordinary American citizens also met with the Secret Service, FBI, United States District Court, SCOTUS, and Pentagon and SERVED PRESENTMENTS!!! This is OUR COUNTRY, NOT HIS! IT IS ALSO OUR MONEY, AND NOT HIS!Mack and I would like to thank fellow Patriots Penny and Chalice for their dedicated hard work. *************************************************
Carl, I personally called (and so did my boyfriend) the Chief Judge Magistrate Royce Lamberth’s chambers and spoke with his aide in his office. The aide did know about the presentments and said that he was aware that the judge was aware of them also. I told him that we were completely serious about this & that he is urged by the people of the US to look into these charges of TREASON against Obama and the the people are looking for answers. He told me that he certainly would let the judge know about my comments. I have also contacted all the people on your list that were presented with the paperwork also. I have also informed them that they need to take this seriously & that we will be expecting results. Keep up the good work! And THANK YOU! -Deidra Hensley |
July 3rd, 2009 at 7:04 pm
Economic Stimulus. H.R. 5140, the Economic Stimulus Act of 2008, passed 385-35 on January 29, 2008 (Roll Call 25). It would provide about $150 billion in economic stimulus, including $101.1 billion in direct payments of rebate checks (typically $600) to most taxpayers in 2008 and temporary tax breaks for businesses. Creating money out of thin air and then spending the newly created money cannot improve the economy, at least not in the long term. (If it could, why not create even more money for rebates and make every American a millionaire?) The stimulus has no offset and thus increases the federal deficit by the amount of the stimulus because the government must borrow the rebate money. A realistic long-term stimulus can only be achieved by lowering taxes through less government and by reducing regulatory burdens. Marsha Blackburn voted FOR this bill.(Source: The New American – July 21, 2008)
Marsha Blackburn is my Congressman.
She is no conservative.
See her unconstitutional votes at :
http://bluecollarrepublican.com/blog/?p=614
Mickey
July 5th, 2009 at 5:05 pm
Note that Royce Lamberth is not the chief magistrate judge. Magistrate judges rank under district judges. Judge Lamberth is the chief U.S. District Court Judge for the District of Columbia; he’s more powerful than a magistrate judge. See http://www.dcd.uscourts.gov/lamberth-bio.html for his biography.
It’s important to get this information into his possession, but I don’t think he has any legal power to act on it of his own motion. Don’t forget about quo warranto in the D.C. Code. § 16-3501 of the D.C. Code says: “A quo warranto may be issued from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia in the name of the United States against a person who within the District of Columbia usurps, intrudes into, or unlawfully holds or exercises, a franchise conferred by the United States or a public office of the United States, civil or military. The proceedings shall be deemed a civil action.”
Judge Lamberth is the chief judge in the very court mentioned by the D.C. Code as the one to preside over the quo warranto. § 16-3502 of the code goes on: “The Attorney General of the United States or the United States attorney may institute a proceeding pursuant to this subchapter on his own motion or on the relation of a third person. The writ may not be issued on the relation of a third person except by leave of the court, to be applied for by the relator, by a petition duly verified setting forth the grounds of the application, or until the relator files a bond with sufficient surety, to be approved by the clerk of the court, in such penalty as the court prescribes, conditioned on the payment by him of all costs incurred in the prosecution of the writ if costs are not recovered from and paid by the defendant.”
Of course, the Attorney General and U.S. Attorney for Washington D.C. have failed to bring quo warranto. § 16-3503 of the code says: “If the Attorney General or United States attorney refuses to institute a quo warranto proceeding on the request of a person interested, the interested person may apply to the court by certified petition for leave to have the writ issued. When, in the opinion of the court, the reasons set forth in the petition are sufficient in law, the writ shall be allowed to be issued by any attorney, in the name of the United States, on the relation of the interested person on his compliance with the condition prescribed by section 16-3502 as to security for costs.”
So if there is someone out there who requested of either the Attorney General or U.S. Attorney for Washington D.C. that a quo warranto be brought on THEIR (the person’s) behalf, and they didn’t do so (and of course, we know they didn’t), that person can now ask the court (over which Judge Lamberth presides) to institute quo warranto under § 16-3503 of the code. Though it would be wise to have an attorney handle the specifics; I’m thinking Leo Donofrio would be best.
So the question is, is there such a person out there who has documentation to prove that they made such a request to either the Attorney General or U.S. Attorney for Washington D.C.? And if not, perhaps someone should make that request now, and if the two relevant authorities refuse to act then the matter can be moved to a § 16-3503 request as aforementioned.