Barak Obama…confused, AT BEST!

January 8, 2009

Obama Promises Bid to Overhaul

Retiree Spending

 

 

WASHINGTON — President-elect Barack Obama said Wednesday that overhauling Social Security and Medicare would be “a central part” of his administration’s efforts to contain federal spending, signaling for the first time that he would wade into the thorny politics of entitlement programs.

As the Congressional Budget Office projected a record $1.2 trillion budget deficit for this year even before the costs of the nearly $800 billion economic stimulus package being taken up by the House and the Senate, Mr. Obama stepped up his effort to reassure lawmakers and the financial markets that he plans a vigorous effort to keep the government’s finances from deteriorating further.

Speaking at a news conference in Washington, he provided no details of his approach to rein in Social Security and Medicare, which are projected to consume a growing share of government spending as the baby boom generation ages into retirement over the next two decades. But he said he would have more to say about the issue when he unveiled a budget next month.

Should he follow through with a serious effort to cut back the rates of growth of the two programs, he would be opening up a potentially risky battle that neither party has shown much stomach for. The programs have proved almost sacrosanct in political terms, even as they threaten to grow so large as to be unsustainable in the long run. President Bush failed in his effort to overhaul Social Security, and Medicare only grew larger during his administration with the addition of prescription drug coverage for retirees.

Mr. Obama also promised a more intensive effort to weed inefficient and bloated programs out of the federal budget in the short run, creating a White House position to “scour this budget, line by line, eliminating what we don’t need, or what doesn’t work, and improving the things that do.” He named Nancy Killefer to the post, called chief performance officer.

“If we do nothing,” Mr. Obama said, “then we will continue to see red ink as far as the eye can see.”

In an interview later in the day with CNBC and The New York Times, Mr. Obama suggested that he would hold his economic stimulus proposal to the low end of the amounts that economists think will be necessary because it was likely to grow in size as it moved through Congress. He said that he intended to propose a broad overhaul of financial regulation by April, and that he was working with Congressional leaders on his promised plan to limit foreclosures in the wake of the mortgage crisis.

“We’ve got to prevent the continuing deterioration of the housing market,” he said.

Mr. Obama met privately on Wednesday with Mr. Bush, then had lunch at the White House with Mr. Bush and the three living ex-presidents, Jimmy Carter, George Bush and Bill Clinton. In the interview, Mr. Obama said the other presidents had offered him good advice about the job: “How do you make sure that you get good information?” he said. “How do you make sure that people aren’t just telling you what you want to hear?”

The bad fiscal news underscored how, on his first week in Washington since the election, Mr. Obama is being challenged by a broad array of problems, some inherited and some a result of his own missteps, a departure from a transition that until now had been praised as orderly and swift.

The fighting between Israelis and Palestinians will present him with a complex foreign policy challenge immediately upon taking office.

The week opened with the first casualty among Mr. Obama’s cabinet appointments, as Gov. Bill Richardson of New Mexico withdrew as his choice for commerce secretary amid questions about whether he had been adequately vetted. Then Mr. Obama had to apologize to Senate leaders for not informing them of his choice to lead the Central Intelligence Agency, Leon E. Panetta.

On Wednesday, Mr. Obama backed away from his opposition to seating Roland W. Burris as his successor in the Senate, after initially saying that Mr. Burris was unacceptable because he had been chosen by Gov. Rod R. Blagojevich of Illinois, who has been accused of trying to sell the seat. These events are testing the resilience of Mr. Obama’s honeymoon, the depth of public support for him and how much people are willing to move beyond the familiar partisan rancor because of the gravity of the crises when he assumes power.

“When you hit a bump, it may not be obvious at the time whether it’s a mountain or a molehill, but they are rarely mountains,” said David Axelrod, a senior adviser to Mr. Obama. “There are going to be things that go better than other things. The question is, Are we moving in the right direction? The answer is yes.”

The dustup over Mr. Obama’s selection of Mr. Panetta to lead the C.I.A. appeared to cool Wednesday. Senator Dianne Feinstein, a California Democrat and incoming chairwoman of the Select Committee on Intelligence, dropped her criticism, saying, “I believe all systems are go.”

Mr. Obama also was poised to name Cass R. Sunstein, an American legal scholar, to an existing White House post as the administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs. A transition official said late Wednesday that Mr. Sunstein would oversee government regulations and devise new approaches for government efficiencies.

For now, Mr. Obama is seeking to keep the spotlight focused on the economic recovery plan he is urging Congress to pass. He is set to offer a campaignlike address explaining the proposal on Thursday at George Mason University in Virginia, his first speech since winning the election. In the interview, he offered some soothing words to Republicans and the financial markets about his ideological approach, saying it was only the scale and urgency of the economic crisis that led him to support a huge stimulus plan.

“I’m not out to increase the size of the government long- term,” he said. “My preference would be that the private sector was doing this all on their own.”

On Capitol Hill, some Republicans warned that the deficit would be even larger than the Congressional Budget Office has projected, perhaps as much as $1.8 trillion once additional spending bills are approved.

Senator Judd Gregg of New Hampshire, the senior Republican on the Budget Committee, and his House counterpart, Representative Paul D. Ryan of Wisconsin, said the extensive borrowing by the government could be a disaster if Congressional Democrats and the new Obama administration did not also work on long-term solutions including changes to Social Security and Medicare.

Lee ADDS: Someone should tell Barak Obama that neither Social Security for Retirees or MEDICARE are ENTITLEMENT PROGRAMS. I had both MEDICARE and Social Security DEDUCTIONS take out of my paychecks for MANY YEARS. Also, I continue to poay MEDICARE out of my Social Security benefits this very day!

Where will this end?

 

One Response to “Barak Obama…confused, AT BEST!”

  1. Check out SSI & HR-3221 & HR-1851 Says:

    Obama has every intention of HURTING White Senior Citizens. He will Plump Up and Bloat the SSI-Supplemental Security Income Program that way.
    That SSI is for people that are lazy liers that have NEVER WORKED A SINGLE DAY IN THEIR LIVES and say they are, Depressed or have Anxiety from being a Tweeker or Alcoholic and go spend the money at local Dive Bars every month.
    Watch on the 1st of the month. The SSI’s come out like Locust. They ALL have Handicapped Placards on plates or hangers.
    If the ‘Head of Household’ is on SSI, the rest of the entire family within that household ALL get an SSI check too.
    In California, a person can come here age 65 from China or Mexico and walk into a Social Security Office and get cut a check that day while their SSI & SSP for $907 is being processed.
    If they are denied, they will get FREE Legal Aid to fight in court to get that free money.
    Most Mommie’s that don’t want to fulfill their required work within their 5 year lifetime limit while on CalWorks to transition to TANF, just either become a Tweeker or an Alcoholic or Both or become Morbidly Obese, and then instead of going onto TANF with only a few hours of work a week required, they get onto LIFETIME SSI & SSP.
    Their kid will get SSI & SSP too. They can go to college absolutely free. I have NEVER seen an SSI/SSP receipient GET OFF SSI/SSP with a college degree.
    They also get FREE MediCal/MediCaid, the whole family if the ‘head of household’ is on SSI/SSP, get’s free MediCal/MediCaid and a check too!
    Postal Workers can tell you what delivering those checks on the 1st of the month is like with some stacks to minority or lazy whites being an INCH THICK.
    ALL TAX FREE>
    Remember, SSI/SSP Is NOT Social Security or Social Security Disability Income. Yet, SS & SSDI pay Taxes, and HAVE WORKED AND PAID INTO SS, SSI/SSP Pays ZERO taxes!
    The followups every 10 years for SSI/SSP’s is the most hysterical form I have ever seen.
    They just check a few boxes and they are on SSI/SSP for the next 10 years.
    Many have been on SSI/SSP not working and taking life easy on their paid for properties since this was invented in 1974 after the Vietnam War.
    Vietnam Vets are on SSI & SSP alot. Those that took too much Acid/LSD are on SSI/SSP.
    Drunkards that waddle into bars are on SSI/SSP. You can just say your Depressed or have Anxiety, or like my neighbor said, ‘he’s scared to go out of his house and has agoraphobia’.
    He and his entire family has been getting SSI & SSP for 20 years now, plus MediCal and they pay ZERO Premiums and they get 95% of their Property Taxes back each year in a check.
    It’s NOT the elderly that’s the problem. It’s the Bums and the way the Government allows them to continue to collect long and way after they are completely FIT to work even if it’s Data Entry on their big butts from home. They won’t even make them do that!
    Yet an 80 year old will get cut even after they pay taxes and worked!
    All the stupid people that voted for this Monster.
    Go see what he says in Reverse Speech in his Speeches. He calls his Universal Health Care Program, ‘Genocide’ in Reverse Speech, http://www.rense.com http://www.reversespeech.com
    Also, do you realize if you are Hypnotizeable he has been hypnotizing you?
    Just check out Google and type in: Obama Hidden Hypnotize in His Speeches.
    Some cannot be hypnotized, I cannot. So, I did not vote for the fake.
    I knew that all the Demogrants would do this.
    They will take good care of Minorities that mostly live hand to mouth off SSI-Supplemental Security Income & SSP-State Supplemental Program.
    He and his Demogrants will Swell those programs while allowing 80 and 90 years olds to die in their trailer homes after they sell their homes and try and live off that.
    Yet, SSI’s can own a home, paid for if they want. Most do own a home.
    You can qualify for a Section 8 Homeownership loan if you are on SSI to buy a home with the Government’s generous help too. You will pay almost nothing and it goes up to $660,000 in California.
    See, I knew Obama was only going to go after whatever most White people rely on. And, that’s old White people that he truely wants to get Revenge upon.
    He will. He will cut Seniors, and Bloat SSI that Minorities live off.
    Hope this teaches Seniors that were Swayed by their stupid grandkids into voting for this hateful revengful egomanic a lesson. I’m sure it will when you all go to bed hungry and cold, yet those Super Fat Minorities that NEVER work on SSI will just get fatter and happier!

Leave a Reply