The Definition of Losers, Hillary or Obama. Take you pick!

IT’S ALL OVER, SEN. CLINTON

By DICK MORRIS & EILEEN MCGANN

Published in the New York Post on May 7, 2008.

She lost hard in North Carolina, and barely held on to win Indiana. Hillary Clinton just doesn’t have enough straws left to clutch. The best (or worst) she can hope to do the rest of the way is bloody Barack Obama enough to make him lose in the fall, allowing her to come back in 2012.

In fact, Obama basically clinched the nomination with his string of 11 straight primary and caucus wins in February, many by wipe-out margins - giving him a lead in elected delegates that Clinton couldn’t hope to close, especially given the nutty proportional-representation rules that govern the Democratic Party.

Do the math. Last night’s results leave him with a lead among elected delegates of 150 or so, and among all delegates of around 130.

Only a handful of states are left to vote, with a combined total of about 230 delegates. She’ll probably win West Virginia, Kentucky and Puerto Rico - and lose Oregon, North Dakota, and Montana. She most likely could pick up a net 10 delegates, leaving him with a lead of at least 130 (110, counting in superdelegates).

If Hillary manages to get Florida and Michigan seated (which she won’t), she’ll net another 47 delegates. So Obama, worst case, will have a lead of at least 60 delegates. Most likely, it’ll be more than 100.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Democratic Chairman Howard Dean have all made it clear that they expect superdelegates to decide who to support within (in Reid’s words) “days, not weeks” after the last ballots are cast on June 3.

In that environment, Obama - who’ll be only about 100 delegates short of a majority - will be an irresistible choice. Few superdelegates will want to risk civil war by overruling the verdict of the voters - and almost all will want to climb aboard the victory bandwagon so as not to get shut out of the White House for four (or eight) years.

In the past few months, Obama has closed Clinton’s lead among superdelegates from 60 to 20. The trend will accelerate after popular voting ends; he’ll probably pass the 2,025 threshold in the first two weeks of June.

Clinton may stay in, hoping to can seat Florida and Michigan. But she won’t win there, either.

The Credentials Committee, which will make the key report, consists of three votes for each state or territory. The remaining contests will leave him with, at worst, a 10-state lead. Howard Dean names 25 committee members, but she can’t prosper unless he stacks them all for her - and, if anything, he’ll go the other way.

Having lost there, her only option would be to appeal to the convention floor - where neither of the contested delegations can vote on their own credentials, virtually assuring an Obama victory on the credentials fight and the nomination.

Clinton may well fight all the way - she’s stubborn and dedicated. More, she’s also farsighted and devious: She could hope to so bloody Obama that he can’t beat John McCain. If McCain wins, she could get the Democratic nomination in 2012 - and, with McCain closing in on 76 and after 12 years of GOP rule, win.

But one thing is clear: Obama has this nomination sewed up.

Lee ADDS: I continue to be disgustingly amazed at the slate of Candidates of the Party of the Left. Hlllary and Obama, both Marxists, both intent on fleecing America, both intent on a government for the elite and both destructive to the American way of life.

3 Responses to “The Definition of Losers, Hillary or Obama. Take you pick!”

  1. matt Says:

    Hilliary and Obama want a government for the elite?? What about the Bush administration, with its backdoor dealings and privatizing the whole of the Iraq support system? No to mention tax breaks for the highest one percent that shaft the common man and the poor. Thats what I’d call a government for the elite.

  2. Lee S. Gliddon, Jr. Says:

    Tax breaks were for EVERYONE under the Bush Administration…Each and EVERY PERSON!
    I don’t really know what, “Privatizing the whole Iraq support system,” is all about. What was privatized? What “tax breaks” are you talking about? The same as EVERYONE ELSE got?

    This 1 percent lingo is all the Dems could come up with. To boot, their lingo hides the truth! They prohibit all energy production, are trying to reward the real estate speculators by making sure they make money and use this as an excuse to give money to La Raza.

    A Vote for Obama is only reflective of one fact. “It does not take a lot of soap to brainwash the supporters of Obama!”

  3. George C Booker Says:

    A Vote for Obama is only reflective of one fact. “It does not take a lot of soap to brainwash the supporters of Obama!” I aggree! Neither does the water have be green, Al Gore.

    The question is who is Mahmoud Barack Hussein Obama? Is he an American African Muslim? What is his true religion? Does he think the American people believe that after 20 years of Rev Wright’s religious views of American that he simply didn’t hear the hate or didn’t hear the Anti-Semitism in his sermons? Come not all of Americans drinks from the same cool-aid fountain.

    If, nothing else HIllary Rodom Clinton can divide the votes and the Democratic party at the same time! Run again 2012 and win…you go girl.

    America is not read for a novice Senator to be elected President. Who, if he withdraws American troops from Iraq will cause the death of 2 million people with purple fingers.

    Race is a major factor, but his religion and social ties plus his tanted background trumps his style and wit just a bit.

Leave a Reply