Pakistan Rivals Join to Fight Musharraf
By JANE PERLEZ
The accord created a direct threat to Mr. Musharraf because the restored judges could act on petitions challenging the validity of his re-election last October when he was still head of the army. Mr. Musharraf’s critics contend he dismissed the judges last November for the very reason that he was fearful they would invalidate his presidency.
The deal, announced by Asif Ali Zardari, the leader of the biggest party, the Pakistan Peoples Party, and Nawaz Sharif, the head of the Pakistan Muslim League-N, also dashed the hopes of the Bush administration that Parliament would work in harmony with Mr. Musharraf.
The White House considers Mr. Musharraf a favored ally in the American fight against militants aligned with Al Qaeda and the Taliban who have regrouped in Pakistan, but Mr. Musharraf is deeply unpopular here.
Mr. Musharraf had no comment on the accord. As of late Sunday in Washington, the State Department and the White House also had no comment.
Mr. Zardari and Mr. Sharif, appearing at a news conference together in the Himalayan foothill resort area of Bhurban, said they would implement a Charter for Democracy that included removing the president’s power to dissolve Parliament and his power to appoint the chiefs of the military services.
The judges who were fired Nov. 3 after the imposition of emergency rule by Mr. Musharraf would be reinstated by a parliamentary resolution within 30 days of the convening of the new Parliament, they said.
Parliament would then pass a law voiding the ruling by the post-November Supreme Court that had legalized the dismissal of the judges, said Ashtar Ausaf Ali, a lawyer who drafted the resolution and is a senior member of the Pakistan Muslim League-N. The agreement settled important differences that had clouded the postelection atmosphere after the successes of Mr. Zardari’s and Mr. Sharif’s parties in the February elections, in which Mr. Musharraf’s party was routed.
Mr. Zardari, widower of the slain party leader, Benazir Bhutto, had seemed to stall on Mr. Sharif’s insistence that the judges be reinstated, apparently out of fear that the judges would reopen corruption cases filed against him in the 1990s.
He was also under pressure, associates said, from the United States and Britain not to agree to the reinstatement as chief justice of Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, who has been criticized by diplomats for being unpredictable on matters of terrorism.
For his part, Mr. Sharif had indicated that members of his party would not sit in the cabinet while Mr. Musharraf remained in power. But on Sunday, Mr. Sharif, reading in English a “summit declaration,” said, “The coalition partners are ready to form the governments, and the national and provincial assemblies should be convened immediately.”
It is up to Mr. Musharraf to convene Parliament. On Friday, at a time when agreement between the two parties seemed somewhat distant, the president said he would call the Parliament in 10 days “if there was peace in the country.”
Mr. Sharif, who was twice prime minister in the 1990s, said his party would participate in the cabinet that would be dominated by the Pakistan Peoples Party, the largest vote getter in the February elections. He appeared to accept the idea that his cabinet members would have to take the oath of office from Mr. Musharraf, an act Mr. Sharif had previously said he would oppose.
Mr. Sharif was overthrown in October 1999 in a bloodless military coup by then-General Musharraf, and holds a particular enmity against the president, who he says should resign. Mr. Musharraf stepped down as the head of the army in December.
After the joint announcement, a lawyer who is active in the lawyers movement that has mobilized in favor of the restoration of the judges, Athar Minallah, said he was confident that the justices, including Mr. Chaudhry, would be reinstated.
“I don’t see any hurdle in the restoration of the judges now,” he said. “It’s a positive day for democracy in this country.”
The reinstatement of the dismissed judges of the Supreme Court and four High Courts in the provinces would represent a special danger to Mr. Musharraf because the courts would probably be presented with new petitions seeking to overturn the president’s re-election in October, lawyers said.
Lee ADDS: Let’s be careful here! Remember what happened when Jimmy Carter abandoned the Shah of Iran.
